APRIL 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022
Study of Strategic Program Evaluation of Satrya Emas in Pasuruan District
1Ahmad Khakim, 2Fadillah Putra
1,2Posgraduate Program of Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Veteran Street , Ketawanggede, Lowokwaru, Malang City, East Java, 65145
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i4-26

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research specifically examines the evaluation of the Satrya Emas strategic program in Pasuruan Regency. The Government of Pasuruan Regency has a strategic role in the effort to succeed in the program to increase opportunities and capabilities in the field of community economic services that are beneficial, this is a business activity that provides broad capabilities in the field of employment and economic services. Besides that, it can also play a role in the process of equitable distribution and increase in people's income and encourage economic growth in Pasuruan Regency. The purpose of this program is to find out the existence of MSMEs (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises) which are still constrained by capital, access to marketing networks, and increasing product competitiveness based on the potential of the Pasuruan Regency area which is the target of foreign investment. With this innovation, it is hoped that the Satrya Emas Strategic program can become a strategic center and business development that is integrated, innovative, solution-oriented, and sustainable, quickly, accurately, and cheaply. So that this research can produce findings that explain the impact of the implementation of the Satrya Emas Strategic program and the obstacles and shortcomings in the implementation of the Satrya Emas strategic program.

KEYWORDS:

Evaluation, Satrya Emas, Economic Development, Strategic Program.

REFERENCES

1) Amboningtyas, D. (2018). Pengembangan Capacity Building Dalam Peningkatan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Pada Usaha Kecil Menengah Di Kecamatan Tugu, Semarang. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 3(2).

2) Archvadze, N. (2021). Evaluation of Psycho-Social Factors of Fear. Vectors of Social Sciences, 1(2).

3) Atmaja, H. E. (2018). Pentingnya Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Meningkatkan Usaha Kecil Menengah. Jurnal REKOMEN (Riset Ekonomi Manajemen), 2(1), 21-34.

4) Cui, T., Fox, C., & O'Sullivan, M. J. (2019). A posteriori stochastic correction of reduced models in delayed‐acceptance MCMC, with application to multiphase subsurface inverse problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 118(10), 578-605.

5) Dessart, F. J., Barreiro-Hurlé, J., & van Bavel, R. (2019). Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 46(3), 417-471.

6) Dunn, W.N. (1994). Public policy analysis: an introduction. Second Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc

7) George, B., Walker, R. M., & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 810-819.

8) Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?. Policy design and practice, 2(1), 1-14.

9) Issam, K. (2021). Planning, Programming, Budgeting And Evaluation System: Tunisian Experience. Defense Resources Management in the 21st Century, 16(16), 130-138.

10) Levitt, H. M. (2021). Qualitative generalization, not to the population but to the phenomenon: Reconceptualizing variation in qualitative research. Qualitative Psychology, 8(1), 95.

11) Mehling, W. E., Acree, M., Stewart, A., Silas, J., & Jones, A. (2018). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2). PloS one, 13(12), e0208034.

12) Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of public policy.

13) Rahmah, S. (2019). Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia Terhadap Pembiayaan Murabahah Pengembangan UMKM. Laa Maisyir: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 6(1), 126-147.

14) Scipioni, M. (2018). Failing forward in EU migration policy? EU integration after the 2015 asylum and migration crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1357-1375.

15) Stokan, E., Deslatte, A., & Hatch, M. E. (2021). Exploring the trade-offs local governments make in the pursuit of economic growth and equity. Urban Affairs Review, 57(4), 1084-1114.

16) Suci, Y. R. (2017). Perkembangan UMKM (Usaha mikro kecil dan menengah) di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Cano Ekonomos, 6(1), 51-58.

17) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2008 tentang Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah

18) United Nations Development Programme. 2016. Human Development Report 2016. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

19) United Nations. 2010. Creative Economy Report 2010. Creative Economy: A Feasible Development Option. Collaborative Effort Led by United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and United Nation Development Programe (UNDP) Special Unit for South-South Cooperation. dari: http://www.unctad. org/creative-economy. Diakses 17 September 2021

20) Van Buuren, A., Lewis, J. M., Guy Peters, B., & Voorberg, W. (2020). Improving public policy and administration: exploring the potential of design. Policy & Politics, 48(1), 3-19.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar